God’s Sarcasm
I have a new favorite comic. Not the whole series, a specific strip.
Why do I like this particular comic so much? The kid, Slick, starts out sad because the world sucks so much. He gets ticked and starts screaming at God, and God throws up a hand puppet and mocks him. Isn’t that horrible? Some of my conservative friends are offended that I used the word suck, and they’re more offended that this kid is yelling at God. Some of my liberal friends are offended because God is pictured as a sarcastic jerk who mocks our pain.
Me? I love it. Look at that last frame, where God pulls out the sarcasm. Look at Slick’s face. He’s smiling! That’s me. Totally.
The world sucks. If you’re not seeing that, then you’re either amazingly sheltered or willfully blind. Lots of good stuff too, for sure, but nothing to counterbalance hatred, disease, poverty, and death. It’s not even close. Yet here I am, raised to believe that a loving God is ultimately in charge. So I say to God, basically, “Life is SUCKING!!” Except I say it nicer than that because, you know, he’s God. God knows what I was going to say, but I think he appreciates the effort. (And yes I know God isn’t male, stop being pedantic or go away.)
And you know what God says back? Well, nothing really. Nothing I could point to and say “Thus sayeth the Lord.” (Part of me would love to be that kind of prophet, and part of me is still too scared to ask. Read the book. It sucks to be a prophet.) It’s just feelings, intuitions, coincidences, thoughts, scriptures, insights, even the odd dream and it all adds up to something very like that comic.
God is funny.
And sarcastic.
And some days, exactly what I need to get myself off my whiney butt and back in the fight is for God to go, “Boo hoo hoo. Life is soooo hard for you. Booo hoo hooo!” Maybe I’m weird. Ok, I know I’m weird. But that’s the God I know.
Is love safe?
Scripture says perfect love drives out fear, meaning that understanding God’s love frees you from the fear of hell and death. But I think the principle holds more broadly than that. To love is to acknowledge the human in the other. Like this guy did.
In that situation, most people would pick one of two responses.
1. They would get scared and hand over the cash.
2. They would get angry and kick his butt.
Neither option takes a second to look at the kid. All they see is a knife. Love takes the time to see our enemies for who they are, human beings, children of God. Was the guy’s reaction “safe”? No way. But maybe safety is overrated. Maybe love matters more.
Open Source Sermon Retrospective
First thing: thank you! It was a blast working with all of you to create something new. Reaction on Sunday morning was very good and I’m still getting comments from people. I am convinced that it was a stronger, more compelling sermon because of your involvement, and I’m very happy to pronounce the experiment a success. (Here’s the text and video in case you missed it)
How did it go? As I said above, response from the congregation was strong and positive. As for how it went from my perspective in the pulpit, it was fun and a little scary. I found myself a little more tied to my manuscript than usual because I wanted to honor everyones contributions. I also spoke more quickly than is normal for me because it was longer than my usual sermons. On the other hand, there was a sense of comfort or community because I felt like I was speaking for all of us. It felt like you were up there with me. (Yeah, cheesy, whatever. It’s true)
What did you do right? We took the time to lay the groundwork. In fact, we spent much more time on groundwork than we did on the actual sermon. We took our time picking a topic, picking texts, aligning principles and purpose. All those discussions and agreements meant that the sermon itself came together much more quickly and smoothly than I had expected. I can’t emphasize enough how important this was. From the very start I feared our experiment would result in a chaotic mishmash of conflicting ideas and spam. The fact that we wound up with a coherent and compelling sermon testifies to the integrity of the contributors and the hard work we did coming to consensus before we started writing the sermon.
What would you change?
- I wouldn’t use PBwiki again. Their customer support is great and they gave me excellent administrative controls, but a number of people complained about the interface. People had a hard time signing up, and once they signed up they had a hard time making edits. I think I’d try Wikia next time. Their interface is very clean and simple.
- I’d make the whole thing simpler. There was way too much “Click here, check there, sign up here, wait for confirmation, blah blah blah” when the whole reason people got involved was because it was a cool idea. People wanted to contribute! It was my job to make it as easy as possible for them to do so, and in my excitement I left way too many stumbling blocks laying around between them and their goal
- I would try to open it up to more involvement. A truly open source project would be less controlled and have many more contributors. I wasn’t brave enough for that on the first go, but I’d definitely take a step in that direction if we tried it again.
What did you learn? The Pareto principle is your friend. I spent a long time lamenting the 80/20 rule as it applied to church life, but this experiment renewed my perspective. A small, committed group did most of the heavy lifting. The members of that group shifted during each stage of the project, but there was always a core keeping things on track and pushing the project forward. Then there was a cloud of of interested observers, some were too busy, some were too shy, but whatever their reason they didn’t contribute in large ways. The crazy thing was, they contributed in their own little ways and all those tiny contributions made a big difference. Even if your only contribution was an idea that never made it into the final draft, your presence in the conversation made the whole thing stronger. Thank you.
Will you do it again? I honestly don’t know. Certainly I benefited from the experience, and the sermon was better for it, but I still have some real questions. Part of the reason the sermon worked was because it was about technology. Would a similar format work with a more traditional subject? Also, we spent almost two months on this thing! Most preachers I know spend a week on theirs. Would it still work in a shorter time window? Those aren’t deal-breakers. I hear some responses knocking around in the back of my head already, but I’d have to mull it over a bit before I said yes. For sure I wouldn’t do it the same way, but a second experiment is not out of the question.
What do you think? What did we do right? What could we do better? What did you learn? Should we try again?
P.S. - Thank you to everyone who linked to the project!
Emergent Village
Think Christian
The Church Geek
Gemeindearbeit
Ranges Community Church
Open Source Sermon: Complete
Title: Jesus is My Facebook Friend
- Primary Text: 1 Corinthians 12:12-31
- Secondary Text: Hebrews 10:23-25
Video Here (You’ll note minor differences between the text and the video. Those are my fault, most often the result of looking up from the text to engage the congregation.)
The church father Tertullian asked a lingering question, “What does Athens have to do with Jerusalem? Or the Academy with the Church?” Meaning, what is the connection between Christianity and philosophy? Is there a connection at all? Should there be? Today, the question might be, “What does Jerusalem have to do with Silicon Valley?”
When I was a kid, I watched the Jetsons. It rocked. Robot maids, your own personal spaceship which transformed into a briefcase, and turkey dinners at the push of a button. I dreamed about the future. Talking via video phone to my buddy on Mars; telling my car, “Home, James!” and then reading my holographic comic book in the backseat while the car flew me there; or hopping the mach 9 train to London for lunch and spot of tea. But the future arrived without my dreams on board. We never walked on Mars. My car still drives with four wheels firmly planted, turkey still takes all day to cook, and I still have to clean my own house. Instead of flying cars, we got the internet.
The internet brought us into a digital age, full of information and unprecedented connectivity. At least, that’s what the ads say. We can google weather patterns in Mongolia in as much time as it takes to check the clouds over Wauwatosa. We can get news delivered instantly to our phones. We can send cute pictures to grandma down in Florida. The internet is amazing! But there is another reality behind the hype.
The net has two inherent flaws: information overload, and information equality. But information overload isn’t the real problem. As David Allen says, “If information overload were the problem, the first time you walk into a library your head would explode.” The problem isn’t info; it’s meaning. Each bit of information lays some claim on us, on our attention, pulling us in a hundred different directions. Why? Because all the information is equal.
In the age of newspapers and television, you could at least hold someone accountable when they spread useless, false, or harmful ideas. Now the bigots, racists, terrorists, and nutjobs get their own websites. There is no such thing as a “fringe” opinion anymore, because anyone can find a compatriot on the net willing to champion their cause. Did you know there are now online communities dedicated to helping girls stay anorexic? It’s call “Pro Ana” and in pro-anorexia. They share tips on how to avoid raising suspicion, how to evade your parent’s intrusive attempts to make sure you don’t starve yourself to death. They encourage each other and share pictures of thin girls. They call in thinspiration. Welcome to the net. All the pain and brokenness of the world, in every shade and style, can now be served up 24/7 in the privacy of your own home.
The internet is a land of illusion. You never really know who is on the other side. No one has names, only handles, nicknames that can be changed or discarded at will. The results are predictable: rude, crude, and lewd. Even the so-called anonymity of the net is an illusion, when every site you visit is being recorded by your internet service provider. Counterintuitively, the net leaves some of us feeling more disconnected than ever before. Kids flunk out because they’re too busy playing video games, marriages fail thanks to online pornography or gambling addictions. People are plugged into their computers but distant from their families. Friends fight over the misunderstood intention of a text message, when a simple face to face would have solved the problem.
At first, it looked like the net was just a toy for geeks and professors. Then some brilliant miscreant reinvented the world’s oldest profession, simultaneously launching e-commerce, the dot com bubble, and the world’s largest collection of pornography. When I talk technology with adults today, the most common feeling they share is fear. We are afraid someone is going to steal our identity, or stalk our children. We’re afraid the violent exploitation that passes for “adult entertainment” will warp their self-image. We’re afraid the minds of the next generation will be so numbed by video games that they won’t be prepared to lead our country. We’re afraid their moral compass will be so broken they won’t care for us when we’re old. We’re afraid that someone we love will be the next to appear on the endless parade of brokenness we call the evening news.
But are these problems exclusive to the digital realm? Don’t these same fears exist in our face-to-face relationships? We hide our true selves from each other, even at church, especially at church. How many people really know you? How many people do you trust enough to let your guard down? We wear the masks of polite society. Addictions –to alcohol, or drugs, or whatever–have always hidden behind closed doors. Child abuse is not an internet phenomenon. All these things that we fear about the net: addiction, abuse, theft, bullying, con-games, these are not new problems. The internet is simply magnifying and making more visible what was already there.
The promises of the future are not ALL empty and the results of technology are not all bad. Despite the very real hazards of the internet, there are also very real opportunities. Your kids and grandkids really do have friends from other countries; not “penpals,” but actual friends that they have relationships with–share life with–on a daily basis. They can become members of communities with similar ideals from all across the globe. That exposure to people outside their physical world means this upcoming generation really is more open-minded and less prejudiced than those that came before.
We denigrate exclusively digital relationships. But perhaps in the safe-shelter of cyber space–the soul can emerge in a way that is difficult in the “real” world. Parker Palmer, in his book entitled A Hidden Wholeness (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004), writes of the need for space in our lives to be open to others–to bare our souls. In our communities we can readily see people’s intellect, their emotions, and certainly their egos! But rarely do we connect to someone’s soul. Palmer says the soul is shy. It does not surface amongst the noise of ego or the intimidation of the intellect. Only in a “circle of trust” does the soul come out to play. Such a circle is not common in the world, or even in our churches, but on the internet, where one has the shield of a virtual identity free of reprisals, it is easier to share the things we would keep hidden.
Perhaps this cyber-world–despite its potential evils and lurking dangers–really has something to offer. A place to connect without the “language games or interpersonal dances” we engage in as human beings. Perhaps our image of “the net” is not one which entangles and ensnares, but one which binds up wounds and heals the broken hearted. . .
You’d be amazed how many people helped write this sermon: an old friend of mine from high school, professors from undergrad and graduate schools, fellow congregational ministers, lay people and ministers from the Emerging Church conversation, skateboarders from Tosa Skateboarders United, athiests, agnostics, and Hindus from my favorite gamer community. One of them asked me to share this story with you. He says:
“I was raised as a Christian, and I believed for most of my life. I think the worst thing for my beliefs was going to a Christian middle school - The way many of those people acted while calling themselves ‘Christian’ and going to a ‘Christian’ school was just something I couldn’t stand. Granted, it was better than going to public school, but it wasn’t good for my beliefs. I started doubting then; It really kicked me when I went into 9th grade in a public school. There were so many people who claimed they were Christian and acted horrible - And there were so many people who were not that acted so much better. I never stopped believing there was a ‘God’ or perhaps ‘gods’ - It didn’t make sense to me otherwise - but I did stop believing in the bible. Later, I found Rob through a game called ‘Allegiance’ - I didn’t talk to him for quite a while, as I didn’t want to talk to someone as religious as him while I was not. Then he started his blog - That is what brought me back. A person that can be in a game based on war, and be familiar with computers, and still be a pastor was something I’d never expect. I started reading his blog, and the subject of this thing, the ‘Open Source Sermon,’ came up. I was interested, and offered an topic (Aliens, because the Vatican had recently acknowledged that they could exist), although I still didn’t consider myself ‘Christian.’ Now that there is work on it, and just with talking to him, I’ve now returned to considering myself ‘Christian’ - Although my views might get some people in a stir, with some differences in interpretations from what is considered the norm. It’s weird, though, that I am a Christian because of a video game.”
What does all this have to do with the church? Kevin Kelly coined the word “generatives” to talk about those things that are “better than free,” things that hold their value in a digital world because they can never be copied and transmitted over a network, things like: immediacy, authenticity, and embodiment. Those generatives might be rare commodities on the net, but churches, at their best, have always been generative communities. The immediacy of a live sermon and music sung by a trained choir, the authenticity of friendships built over years, even the simple embodiment of dragging yourself out of bed and going to the meeting house, to listen and to learn. These things can never be digitized.
Local congregations are local for a reason. They connect specific groups of people in a specific place at a specific time. Online relationships offer a chance to explore ideas and connect with people across the globe. But we need both! Recent history has shown us that people are moving towards a more global community, and the internet is certainly paving the way. We need exposure to a global perspective to be aware of the changing world around us. We also need a touchstone to ground us in our community lest we lose sight of the people around us. The digital can be great for addressing global issues, but it’s people that need the real help. People with names and faces. What good are all those digital words, if we don’t actually help someone? What good is the internet without the church?
Paul speaks of the church in 1 Corinthians. He uses an analogy of the human body–we, as Christ’s followers, make up the whole body of Christ. There are 206 bones in the body of a mature adult, somewhere between 656 and 850 muscles–depending on which expert you ask. Think about all of the parts–connected through the nervous system and the circulatory system; parts that “communicate” with each other and the brain. The body must communicate in order to function. Strokes, Alzheimer’s, and paralyzation are all so debilitating specifically because they disrupt communication. Not all of the parts “see” each other face-to-face. An eye will never have direct contact with a pancreas, but if the pancreas stops functioning the eye can lose its ability to see. Indeed, as Paul says–if one part suffers the rest suffers along with it; if one part is honored, the whole rejoices.
Paul was not thinking of the internet when he wrote this letter. However, by writing this letter he was using the best technology of his day to communicate with the body of Christ in Corinth. We do the same today. Missionaries in far away lands send prayer requests and celebrations to home congregations and inspire that part of the body of Christ to keep moving and supporting mission work. Youth ministers continue to counsel with those placed under their care, even when they leave for college, even when they leave for Iraq. These tools are an opportunity to reclaim the fellowship that once defined us as people.
The Christians of Acts 2 were in each other’s lives. They did not just see each other one day of the week for a couple of hours. Church was often an all day event. Meals were shared. Throughout the week people saw each other, worked together, played together. Look around you this morning. Ask yourself, “How often do I see these people during the week? Do I know them? Or are we just aquaintances sharing a pew?”
Facebook and Twitter are two online services that let you share tiny little updates on your life. One of the ministers who helped write this sermon uses Facebook to keep up with several of his congregation. He says, “It’s great to see the status messages–to know what is going on with folks day by day so that I can ’suffer or rejoice’ with them–so that they can be prayed for.” Likewise his updates help them feel connected to their minister in a new way. These are real status updates from his Facebook page “just hanging out with my spouse for the day;” “feeling kind of squishy;” “glad the hard part of the day is over;” “reading Martin Buber;” “watching the Coco channel on TV while spinning yarn and really should go to bed”
These updates, mundane as they seem, give real insight. They provide a bird’s eye view into someone’s life, a gestalt of all the things they’d never waste your time to mention face to face. Would you pick up the phone and call 125 friends to let them know what you’re sitting in church right now? But this moment is part of who you are, a reflection of your soul. Palmer says, “Community does not necessarily mean living face-to-face with others; rather it means never losing the awareness that we are connected to each other. It is not about the presence of other people–it is about being fully open to the reality of relationship, whether or not we are alone” (Wholeness, 2004:55).
All the things we take for granted, a meeting hall, a hymnal, an organ, all of these were once innovations. Our pilgrim ancestors would never have allowed a “devil’s box of whistles” in their house of worship, yet for some of us the most spiritually intense moments of our lives are associated with the swell of an organ and congregational song.
But what about the non-techies? There are some people in this room that wouldn’t know a blog if it came up and bit them, and there is nothing wrong with that. Can we state that clearly and for the record? If you’re not interested in developing an entirely new skillset just so you can send someone an email, that is ok. But there’s another story that doesn’t get much screen time. Some people want desperately to join the online community, but they don’t have that choice. That choice is made for them. How do we connect with the digitally marginalized? That kind of problem was tailor made for the church because it means helping individuals who have names and faces. It means learning their stories, and teaching them new ones. It means understanding their context, all the social and economic webs that are contributing to their problems, and helping them change that context by first changing themselves.
That’s the work of a lifetime, and you cannot do it sitting in a pew. Sitting here and waiting for people to show up may have worked 50 years ago; it will not work now. We are no longer the standing church. The upwardly mobile no longer come here looking to rub elbows with Wauwatosa’s upper crust. And thank God. Because I’ve been here a little over two years now, and when I look out into the pews today, I don’t see a bunch of country club church goers, hoping to fit in. I see passionate people who are here because they want to be; not because it’s socially acceptable, but because they’ve experienced something they want desperately to share, especially with their children and their grandchildren. But not stopping there, just starting there.
So what’s the first step? Our text from Hebrews says to hold tightly to our hope. Our hope in God, through Jesus Christ. And to act and speak in ways to build up and affirm others. And to keep meeting together. To go where the people are. If they’re on the net, get online. If they’re in the pub, have a drink. If they’re in the gutter, then don’t you dare walk by on the other side. No matter what we do or how we do it; whether we talk to someone, looking them in the eye over a cup of coffee, or sign into a voicechat server that connects London to California, we all have one great ability: to reflect the light that is God’s love all throughout this beautiful, broken world. Christ did not sit up in heaven and wait for us to arrive. He stepped outside himself and became one of us. Go and do likewise.
Contributors:
Mark Baird
Kevin Brink
Rev. Robert Brink
Martine Haglund
Jason Hanson
Rev. Rick Hartley
Arun Krishnan
Ruhama Kordatzky Bahr
Jason LeClare
Rev. Randy Lubbers
Rev. Sarah McQueen
Mario Morales
Ryan Morgan
Mary Pruitt Martinez
Jordan Propst
Stephen Quadro
Ellen Restyanszki
Dave Settle
Leslie Shultz
Carol Taylor
Christy Tucker
Carol Taylor
Rev. Jeremy Wood

Jesus is My Facebook Friend is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at revsmilez.com.
Open Source Sermon Launch
Thank you to everyone who shared ideas and suggested texts for the world’s first open source sermon. It’s so cool to watch the ideas come together. Your depth of thought and respect for each other give me hope that this experiment will produce something worth preaching.
Here’s the full list of texts you all suggested: Romans 12:3-8, Hebrews 10:25, Matthew 28:16-20, 1 Corinthians 12:12-31, 1 Corinthians 9:22, Ephesians 4:1-16, Acts 2, 2 Cor 5:9-10, Luke 7:31-35
Based on your comments and the principles of the project, I’ve chosen two. Not that we’re limited to these texts, but these are foundational. I keep hoping that someone will add insight from other faith traditions or schools of philosophy, but there’s plenty of time for that as we continue to piece this thing together.
And the winners are….
- Primary Text: 1 Corinthians 12:12-31
- Secondary Text: Hebrews 10:23-25
Now comes the really fun stuff. Go to the Open Source Sermon wiki and start writing! (What’s a wiki?) The first thing you’ll notice is that I’ve locked the sermon workspace and created a “start here” link asking us to define our purpose. No sense trying to collaborate if half of us want to build a hot rod and the other half want to build an eco-cruiser. Once the purpose is clear, we’ll crack the workspace and then it’s edit, edit, edit, straight through to the deadline, Sept 20.
I’ll lock the wiki at noon, Central Standard Time (GMT-6) and present the result to my senior minister. That’s when we find out if this experiment is a success. Can the net produce a preachable sermon? I seriously don’t know. But it’s going to be a blast finding out.
Open Source Reprieve
I’m going camping this weekend with a bunch of folks from church, which means I’ll be out in the middle of nowhere Saturday. Now, I could be a rule-minder and go find some coffee shop to work out of for a couple hours, but I think that’d rank pretty low on the Daddy Awesomeness Scale. Therefore, I’m giving all you wonderful contributors a reprieve. I get back from camping on Sunday, so you have between now and then to add your suggestions to the Open Source Sermon Topic thread. I’ll give things a look once I get back and post Sunday night. Assuming all goes well, that post will include our texts and a link to our very own wiki! (What’s a wiki? Click here!)
Spread the word people. This has never been done before. And if that’s not cool enough, your ideas might speak from a pulpit in the not too distant future. Have something to say to the church? To the world?
Keep Your Eyes Open
Take a hint from fighter pilots. In a quickly changing environment, observation equals advantage. Any moment with the current reality differs from you original perception, there is an opportunity, because your observation is unique. Even if someone were intentionally observing the same thing at the same instant, they would be observing from a different perspective. If you discover no advantage, either shift your perspective, or wait.
The Third Way - Zen Style
Koans are the zen version of a parable. I found this one via StumbleUpon. (If you haven’t tried it yet, StumbleUpon is both very cool and very addictive.)
One evening as Zen Master Shichiri Kojun was reciting sutras, a thief with a knife crept in. “Your money or your life!”
Shichiri said, “Do not disturb me. You will find money in the cupboard near the wall.” Then he resumed his recitation as the thief began searching the cupboards.
After a few moments, Shichiri paused and called: “Don’t take it all. I need some to pay taxes with tomorrow.”
The intruder gathered up most of the money and started to leave. “Thank a person when you receive a gift,” Shichiri added. The man thanked him and fled.
A few days later, the thief was caught and confessed to many crimes, including stealing from Shichiri. When Shichiri was called as a witness he said: “This man is no thief, at least as far as I am concerned. I gave him the money and he thanked me for it.”
After he finished his prison term, the man went to Shichiri and became his disciple.
I think Jesus would’ve liked Shichiri.
Open Source Sermon: Topic Chosen
Deadline day. Today’s the day we choose the topic for the world’s first open source sermon. Thanks to everyone who took the time to comment, to make suggestions, and to critique. Here’s the full list of sermon topic proposals pulled from your comments.
- The church’s role in caring for the environment
- The possibility of life on other planets
- The laughter/humor of God
- Christianity vs. narcissism
- Food, fellowship, and eating disorders
- The body of Christ
Based on the comments, the top three suggestions were: the environment, the humor of God, and the body of Christ. I agree that the environment is an important topic, and one too often ignored in churches. On the other hand, I’m obviously interested in the idea of a God that laughs. (Hence the name of my blog!) But I think the body of Christ image has the most to offer in this context.
We are performing an experiment, a two way test. The net promises limitless information and collaboration, but do those promises apply to the church as well? Is Jesus welcome on the net? If not, then this experiment will fail. The open source processes that created elegant, complex software like Linux and Firefox will fail to produce a preachable sermon. All we’ll get is more of the triviality and purposeless argument that so often passes for content on the net.
But the test works both ways. The church promises connections too: peace and wholeness. The church promises more than information: truth, or at least wisdom. It promises we will be the body of Christ, and Christ will be our spiritual head. Then it hides those promises behind walls of bureaucracy and conformity. Is the net welcome in the church? If not, then this experiment will fail. The church that learned Latin, German, English, and thousands of other languages will fail to speak to the digital age. All we’ll get is more of the triviality and purposeless argument that so often passes for sermons on Sunday morning.
If we do it right, the sermon itself will become a meta-message of hope.
Congratulations! We’ve completed the first step. Our subject is the body of Christ in a digital age. Paul has already suggested a possible sermon title, “Jesus is my Facebook Friend”. Our next job is to find scriptures that speak insightfully to that topic. We need at least one Biblical text, but non-biblical texts are welcome as well. Put your suggestions in a comment to this post. The deadline is Aug 23 at noon, Central Standard Time (GMT-6) when I’ll choose the winner(s) with consideration both to the principles of the project and the general consensus of contributors.
Open Source Sermon
Greetings denizens of the internet. My name is Rob and I’m performing an experiment. Can the collective intelligence of the net produce a preachable sermon? Maybe the digital age is incompatible with such an ancient format. Then again, maybe the lurker will join hands with the hacker and usher in an age of peace and enlightenment. Maybe I’m just lazy and want some free content and editing.
Here’s the rundown.
- Project: Craft the world’s first open-source sermon.
- Deadline: Sept. 28th.
- Principles: Biblically based, Christocentric. (not that all contributors must be, only that the final product must be)
The Process:
- Select a topic: Anyone may suggest sermon topics in a comment to this post. Please submit as often you like and comment on other’s suggestions. I’ll choose the winner with consideration both to the principles of the project and the general consensus of contributors. Deadline Aug 9, Noon, Central Standard Time (GMT-6).
- Select a text: I’ll post the topic, and perhaps some initial thoughts, and we’ll open up the comments for suggestions. This time we’ll be searching for Biblical and non-biblical texts that speak insightfully to the topic. I’ll choose a primary Biblical text, and perhaps some secondary ones (Biblical or otherwise) using the same criteria as before. Deadline Aug 23.
- Write and Edit: I’m thinking a wiki is the best option for this step. I’ll post a link here, and then it’s off to the races. The only promise I can make is that your edits will be edited, by me and by others. If you want credit for your contribution, add your name (real names only, please) to the bottom of the document. Deadline is Sept. 20 when I will close the wiki to public edits. I will then present the final result to my senior minister (a former rhetoric and homiletics instructor). If he agrees the sermon is worthy of the pulpit, then the experiment is a success and we move to the next step. If not, I’ve still got a week to write something from scratch.
- Final edit and polish: I’ll take the last week to add finishing touches, modify phrasing to fit my style, and of course practice. Deadline Sept. 28, 9:45 A.M.
- Preach: All contributors will be recognized from the pulpit or in the bulletin. Everyone is of course invited to come listen live. Sept. 28, 10:00 A.M.
- Distribute: We’ll put the sermon text, audio, and video up on this blog under a non-commercial, share-alike Creative Commons license.
Thanks to Idan for the pointing me in a cool new direction!
WARNING!
This is a journal. As in, personal opinions. As in, NOT the official stance of anybody but me. As in, NOT my final answer on anything. As in read at your own risk, your mileage may vary.

